Skip to content

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

The UI test is a good example of a case where this happens. The cycle is due to needing the value of the return type -> _ to compute the variances of items in the crate, but then needing the variances of the items in the crate to do typechecking to infer what -> _'s real type is.

Since we're already gonna emit an error in astconv, just delay the cycle bug as an error.

@rustbot rustbot added the T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. label Aug 10, 2022
@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @nagisa

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Aug 10, 2022
@nagisa
Copy link
Member

nagisa commented Aug 15, 2022

r? @cjgillot

@rust-highfive rust-highfive assigned cjgillot and unassigned nagisa Aug 15, 2022
@compiler-errors compiler-errors force-pushed the return-type-suggestion-cycle branch from 4ca9f8f to eaf480b Compare August 16, 2022 02:42
@compiler-errors compiler-errors force-pushed the return-type-suggestion-cycle branch from eaf480b to 5309375 Compare August 16, 2022 03:00
@cjgillot
Copy link
Contributor

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Aug 16, 2022

📌 Commit 5309375 has been approved by cjgillot

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Aug 16, 2022
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2022
…tion-cycle, r=cjgillot

Do not report cycle error when inferring return type for suggestion

The UI test is a good example of a case where this happens. The cycle is due to needing the value of the return type `-> _` to compute the variances of items in the crate, but then needing the variances of the items in the crate to do typechecking to infer what `-> _`'s real type is.

Since we're already gonna emit an error in astconv, just delay the cycle bug as an error.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2022
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 15 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#99474 (Rustdoc json tests: New `@hasexact` test command)
 - rust-lang#99972 (interpret: only consider 1-ZST when searching for receiver)
 - rust-lang#100018 (Clean up `LitKind`)
 - rust-lang#100379 (triagebot: add translation-related mention groups)
 - rust-lang#100389 (Do not report cycle error when inferring return type for suggestion)
 - rust-lang#100489 (`is_knowable` use `Result` instead of `Option`)
 - rust-lang#100532 (unwind: don't build dependency when building for Miri)
 - rust-lang#100608 (needless separation of impl blocks)
 - rust-lang#100621 (Pass +atomics-32 feature for {arm,thumb}v4t-none-eabi)
 - rust-lang#100646 (Migrate emoji identifier diagnostics to `SessionDiagnostic` in rustc_interface)
 - rust-lang#100652 (Remove deferred sized checks (make them eager))
 - rust-lang#100655 (Update books)
 - rust-lang#100656 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#100660 (Fixed a few documentation errors)
 - rust-lang#100661 (Fixed a few documentation errors)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1948288 into rust-lang:master Aug 17, 2022
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.65.0 milestone Aug 17, 2022
@compiler-errors compiler-errors deleted the return-type-suggestion-cycle branch August 11, 2023 20:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants